Shopping Around For Ideas To Clear the Debt

Last updated : 01 October 2004 By Brock Stoker


It appears that at least part of David Murray’s plan to get rid of all Rangers’ debts includes something innovative to do with the retail business – The Rangers Shop Ltd. Within the overall Rangers business, the shops are a shining beacon. Ever since the manufacturing operation came in-house, selling jerseys has been very lucrative. The cost of RFC buying the jerseys fell – the cost to the punters did not and as a result of this and the continued opening of new stores, we have a growing profitable business.

Profits after taxes were £3.6m in the year to June 2003, more than double the previous year. It paid a £3m cash dividend to its shareholders. Companies House records show that David Murray owns 1 share (or 1%) in The Rangers Shop Ltd which would seem to entitle him to £30,000 for his trouble. In addition over £250,000 was paid to other Murray companies for running the mail order operation – but that’s another, and continuing story.



What’s it worth?

First of all it’s probably worth taking a stab at valuing this company. An average retail company currently trades on 15 times earnings which would make Rangers Shops worth over £50m. This average would, however, include the likes of Marks & Spencer and Laura Ashley which are not really like Rangers, and a more appropriate comparator might be JJB Sports which currently trades on 10 times earnings valuing Rangers Shops at more like £35m.

Which is the right valuation? If average retail companies trade on 15x, then some trade at higher valuations than this. I could argue that a niche retail company, which is opening more shops, and which has an extremely loyal customer base, should trade on a premium multiple rather than a discount like JJB. I would therefore say that £50m is a fair ball park estimate.



How do we get cash out?

So sell it off and the debt disappears! Except so too would the profits and the cash, leaving a hole in the Rangers accounts. This would be like selling the Golden Goose. And how loyal would the customer base be if this happened? Selling a 49% stake in it would still leave control with the club, but investors pay less if they don’t exercise full control. Messing around with the most successful part of a business is dangerous. I’d need convincing that any plans for selling off even part of the Rangers Shops are good idea for Rangers FC.

BROCK STOKER