Cowardly Graham Spiers turns a blind eye to bigotry

Last updated : 06 October 2009 By FF.com
How do you know Rangers won an Old Firm game? The Celtic-minded resort to type and use off-the-field matters to try and score points they failed to achieve on the park.

Graham Spiers, widely known as the discredited journalist, humiliates himself in public once more as his strings are pulled and he is manipulated by people that know him only as the useful idiot.

For him to make a career in football whilst knowing almost nothing about the game only highlights that it's possible for someone in the Scottish press to write about anything other than the beautiful game when posing as a football writer.

The discredited journalist, disliked at the Times and mocked regularly by his peers at other 'papers, has for years lead a one-wimp crusade in an effort to make out bigotry in Scotland is all the fault of the prominent football club in the country. He simply doesn't have the spine to criticise his puppet masters for their years of pro-IRA, anti-Protestant chanting, all done under the ever-thinning veil of Irishness.

Recent articles across the Irish Sea confirm this behaviour is an embarrassment to people of the country and doesn't represent any notion of their character that's familiar; yet this bigotry - unique to the West of Scotland and witnessed against on Sunday - remains almost unmentioned by inadequates like Graham Spiers who don't have the journalistic integrity or the talent to take it on.

Spiers' comments on the Rangers fan sitting behind him have already been confirmed as lies by Rangers supporters at the game. He has a habit of hearing things that never happened, and inventing other songs to suit his agenda. And Graham confirmed again today the reason he isn't taken seriously in his profession or by any of the ever-dwindling readership of the Scottish Times. There are more registrations on the FF messageboard than there are readers of this edition of the 'paper and Spiers, once again, gives his editors a headache as more people will refuse to pay for such sub-standard reporting.